What happens if you put work into the second dimension?

(norbertkozsir.com)

17 points | by abelsm 2 hours ago ago

10 comments

  • projektfu 36 minutes ago ago

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zooming_user_interface

    They mostly do not gain a lot of users. Good luck!

    • trgn 10 minutes ago ago

      this stuff was huge for a while, 20-25 years ago, digital libraries, information exploration, ... consider even things like minority report, or more prosaically, all the demos coming out of MIT medialab.

      It never really caught on, completed got clobbered by free text search, now AI chat interfaces I guess.

      Am glad to see it bubble up again, because have good memories working on this stuff.

      • projektfu 5 minutes ago ago

        I am too lazy to do the work but in that time frame I considered that a zooming/hierarchical view would be a nice way to browse the web, with followed links appearing as new pages next to the current page. The web became too dynamic for that anyway.

    • esafak 5 minutes ago ago

      I think (work)spaces like macOS Spaces because they make access easier; with a single continuous space you have to work, whereas a workspace is a hotkey away.

      After having used such things since the 80s (starting with DESQview) I find myself simply minimizing or leaving secondary application in the background of a single workspace. When I do use other spaces it will be for full screen view. I don't usually need to see multiple windows at the same time, but that would be a task for a tiling manager...

  • condiment 13 minutes ago ago

    Very cool interface and reminiscent of figma/excalidraw in the way they provide an infinite 2d canvas for shapes and figures. Most tools of these types tend to implement layers as well, which might be loosely analogous to multiple desktops and could be a neat interface element to explore. The impetus for layering in a drawing tool is very different from the impetus for doing such in a desktop windowing tool.

    The 3d demos are similar to what you experience when using a VR headset with desktop emulation software. I ran experiments with that for several months and while the concepts were interesting, context switching in a simulated physical space was actually a lot slower than alt+tabbing between things.

  • andrewmutz 14 minutes ago ago

    I've found that working in a style similar to this is very useful for managing multiple threads of work at the same time.

    I use virtual desktops, where each desktop contains a single thing that I am working on, and everything related to it. Then any good window manager can switch between them quickly and even give you a spatial sense of where you are. I organize them as a priority stack, so the topmost priority is in top position and then it goes downward from there

    There's a lot that this "campus" product does that isn't present in such a set up (multi user, zooming, etc...) but virtual desktops give you a lot of the benefit and come built in to most of our operating systems

  • E-Reverance 19 minutes ago ago

    Most similar thing to it I've seen is https://youtu.be/7q-ZhdXk3w4?t=40

  • bpavuk 14 minutes ago ago

    I kinda already have this with Niri's infinite-scrolling horizontal strip and Vicinae as the control plane for complex stuff. like, to replace my Niri setup I'd need a 48:9 (!) monitor

  • lobofta 44 minutes ago ago

    What I like about Niri and hyprland is that I don't need to think about where windows open and about positioning them. This then looks very tiring, but I could be wrong. Would have to play with it.

  • ge96 35 minutes ago ago

    SimulaVR is interesting (VR Desktop) but I was writing code in the middle of the salt lake flats super weird