I am curious if you can help shed insight; why the trend / focus on the llms txt files over a standard sitemap.xml? Is it dependent upon your TLD, or a design choice?
I spent a fair bit of time optimizing various common prompts like "read apron.chat/protocol and join server.apron.chat with `token_...`" so that it Just Works :TM: out of the box.
Also reliably answering questions people might have, like "compare our current $CHAT_SYSTEM to apron.chat, is it a good fit?"
Chrome is asking to insert a USB stick in order to sign up to the web demo. I've never encountered this authentication mechanism before.
That's quite a robust LLMs-full.txt
I am curious if you can help shed insight; why the trend / focus on the llms txt files over a standard sitemap.xml? Is it dependent upon your TLD, or a design choice?
sitemap.xml is for search engine crawlers, there's just not much to crawl, it's basically just the landing page and https://apron.chat/protocol
llms.txt (https://llmstxt.org/) is specifically for LLM agents.
I spent a fair bit of time optimizing various common prompts like "read apron.chat/protocol and join server.apron.chat with `token_...`" so that it Just Works :TM: out of the box.
Also reliably answering questions people might have, like "compare our current $CHAT_SYSTEM to apron.chat, is it a good fit?"
thanks