That's sad. Seems like you're totally dependent on that malign AI service in order to do you job. Your last sentence is the cherry on the cake: 'Full disclosure, I love being enslaved and I love being clapped daily.'.
i would seriously consider changing your sentiment towards Anthropic..rather than being stolen from and then still giving it love.
customer support doesnt need to have empathy towards you. they just need to check if a big condition was met..it was not as per your own words. it was lack of understanding, which is how they happen to make their money..
> Wouldn't the right thing from a Customer Support perspective to give a one-time usage reset in a case like this? If they had a human instead of an agent doing it, would that have changed the outcome?
I spent something like a year and a half arguing with E.ON's very human customer support agents about how it's not OK for them to send bills to a street address which does not exist, especially after they had agreed that it was not OK and to stop doing it half way through this time, but had carried on using the non-existent street anyway.
Some lessons in life are expensive. Now you know and you won't let it happen again and you will make fewer presumptions moving forward. Overall, a win in the experience category.
PS. Im also an everyday user of Claude on the Max plan and I too love it.
They don't give a fuck about you. They have bigger customers to worry about. You are just paying them to improve their training dataset so that you can get kicked out of your own job :).
That's sad. Seems like you're totally dependent on that malign AI service in order to do you job. Your last sentence is the cherry on the cake: 'Full disclosure, I love being enslaved and I love being clapped daily.'.
i would seriously consider changing your sentiment towards Anthropic..rather than being stolen from and then still giving it love.
customer support doesnt need to have empathy towards you. they just need to check if a big condition was met..it was not as per your own words. it was lack of understanding, which is how they happen to make their money..
> Wouldn't the right thing from a Customer Support perspective to give a one-time usage reset in a case like this? If they had a human instead of an agent doing it, would that have changed the outcome?
I spent something like a year and a half arguing with E.ON's very human customer support agents about how it's not OK for them to send bills to a street address which does not exist, especially after they had agreed that it was not OK and to stop doing it half way through this time, but had carried on using the non-existent street anyway.
E.ON are the third highest ranked energy company in the UK for customer service: https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/consumer/energy/energy-sup...
This is to say: customer service is never easy to get right, very easy to get wrong.
Some lessons in life are expensive. Now you know and you won't let it happen again and you will make fewer presumptions moving forward. Overall, a win in the experience category.
PS. Im also an everyday user of Claude on the Max plan and I too love it.
Because their subscription customers lose money. Their enterprise customers make them money, so they focus their energy on them.
If it's really important, you can pay for a second account.
They don't give a fuck about you. They have bigger customers to worry about. You are just paying them to improve their training dataset so that you can get kicked out of your own job :).
because demand is way above what they can handle, thus they can afford any churn from lack of support or sales contact