Qualcomm Legally Proves Arm Breached Its License, Wins $2

(techpowerup.com)

41 points | by LorenDB 17 hours ago ago

10 comments

  • pavel_lishin 15 hours ago ago

    Finally, a corporation gets to have the same sort of class-action-lawsuit experience that we common folk do!

    • sidewndr46 15 hours ago ago

      It'd be payable in a visa card if that was the case

      • gumby 5 hours ago ago

        Apple gift cards

  • jubilanti 16 hours ago ago

    The real issue is not the damages, but:

    > whether Arm's breach lets Qualcomm stop paying royalties under the ALA for five years, which, by some estimates, could be worth billions of dollars

    Which is the next decision for the court. It is a clickbait headline, shame on the author too.

    (Reposting this as a top level comment in case the low effort one I reply to gets downvoted)

  • WheelsAtLarge 12 hours ago ago

    Why the FU to Qualcomm? Obviously the Jury/Judge did not think there was much economic damage but how about Non-Economic Damages? I would think that there would be some of those?

  • ChrisArchitect 15 hours ago ago
  • Soliddune16 16 hours ago ago

    [flagged]

  • tester756 16 hours ago ago

    Why people are not talking about the REAL winners?

    How much lawyers made!

    • jubilanti 16 hours ago ago

      Classic HN low-effort first post that could be written from just the headline.

      The real issue is not the damages, but:

      > whether Arm's breach lets Qualcomm stop paying royalties under the ALA for five years, which, by some estimates, could be worth billions of dollars

      Which is the next decision for the court. It is a clickbait headline, shame on the author too.

      • tester756 14 hours ago ago

        Of course this this whole thing is bigger than that, but that "$1"

        figure appearing everywhere around this topic makes it look funny and cute and that's what I wanted to joke about