Meta new layoff goal of 60% to AI after moving 30% engineers to labelers

(blog.pragmaticengineer.com)

22 points | by ltononro 6 hours ago ago

12 comments

  • Havoc 6 hours ago ago

    Surprised moving engineers to data labelling didn't cause an immediate riot.

  • ChrisArchitect 4 hours ago ago
  • mono442 6 hours ago ago

    With current ai models laying off 50% of engineers seems plausible. Obviously there would be some problems at the start but I'm quite sure it'd work over time.

    • ltononro 6 hours ago ago

      This is quite weird to say imo. I worked for mid-big companies (1-3k+ engineers) where we would never have enough people to execute the projects we wanted and kept postponing stuff to the next cycle. And this was 2024 to mid 2025 I believed that the moment when "coding was solved" we would see a massive improvement of productivity and these already postponed projects that we always wanted to start would be indeed carried out. However, looks like companies don't strive to do More with AI, if that was the case we would not need lay offs. Big companies want to do the bare minimum to keep them alive. They want to do the same, while doing more per person, i.e. reducing employee costs.

    • jplusequalt 5 hours ago ago

      Maybe the silicon valley tech libertarians will realize the necessity of unions when they start cutting engineering teams in half.

      • ltononro 2 hours ago ago

        I mean, I don't think unionizing will make such a difference. Maybe, going in the sense I mentioned above, the work will be more sprayed around in startups. Since big companies just want to do what they've been doing but with less people, instead of doing more per person. This surplus will work with startups and new businesses to disrupt the big ones

      • mono442 5 hours ago ago

        Unions wouldn't help with the layoffs if the engineers are no longer needed.

        • jplusequalt 4 hours ago ago

          >Unions wouldn't help with the layoffs if the engineers are no longer needed

          If tech was unionized like Hollywood is, tech unions could have stopped all of this from happening in the first place.

          • SR2Z 3 hours ago ago

            This has not worked out that well for Hollywood; lots of film and show production has moved out of the state and out of the country.

            The unions are desperately lobbying for studio tax breaks to save the CA movie industry. The industry has shed a third of its jobs since 2022.

            A union might delay the inevitable but the level of blind faith that many people put in them is crazy.

          • tt24 3 hours ago ago

            Why don’t we pay people to dig ditches with spoons? It would produce jobs!

            • jplusequalt 3 hours ago ago

              >Why don’t we pay people to dig ditches with spoons? It would produce jobs!

              Be glib all you want, but research has shown that displaced workers do not have great outcomes [1].

              It's all fun and games to dunk on a person online, but when an entire industry employing millions of people starts to dissolve do to rapid automation, people will have wished there were more calls for organization, social safety nets, etc.

              [1] https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v83y1993i4p685-709.html...