2 points | by chessucation 5 hours ago ago
1 comments
some quick author notes here:
- the 4,811 tasks are derived from 480 jobs and measured against technical ability by deployed systems which then score each job on "replaceability"
- Technical replaceability ≠ replacement, could (by technical capability) vs. does/will
- wrote a short-ish essay on the data and how to read it: https://largelabormodel.com/two-jobs
- full methodology is here: https://largelabormodel.com/methodology-full
- the model is built to be disagreed with (and evolve). would love your input, thoughts, requests, etc. — most useful thing you can do: look up a job you've done and tell me where its task table is wrong
some quick author notes here:
- the 4,811 tasks are derived from 480 jobs and measured against technical ability by deployed systems which then score each job on "replaceability"
- Technical replaceability ≠ replacement, could (by technical capability) vs. does/will
- wrote a short-ish essay on the data and how to read it: https://largelabormodel.com/two-jobs
- full methodology is here: https://largelabormodel.com/methodology-full
- the model is built to be disagreed with (and evolve). would love your input, thoughts, requests, etc. — most useful thing you can do: look up a job you've done and tell me where its task table is wrong