10 comments

  • pj_mukh 2 hours ago ago

    Super cool! How do you think you will want to sell these into robotics teams, I find so many core engineering teams in Robotics companies have a "we'll just build it ourself" attitude around tools like this.

    Have you had luck cracking past that?

    • kstonekuan 2 hours ago ago

      We have had this same experience, and it's a big reason we chose to go open source and make it easy for teams to migrate their business logic onto our SDK instead of requiring them to adopt a new system. By targeting a more foundational layer, we aim to be a part of that "built it yourself" system instead of replacing it.

      • a_t48 2 hours ago ago

        This is a strategy I’m taking as well. Build the tooling that can be integrated into anyone’s platform, over some all in one system that inevitably won’t check all the boxes.

        • kstonekuan 29 minutes ago ago

          Yes, especially in a field moving as fast as robotics, users need the flexibility to extend the system quickly

  • ZeroCool2u 2 hours ago ago

    I'd be interested in using this with something like the new HuggingFace robots. Do you have demos showing how to go from HFlow dataset to training to deploy?

    • kstonekuan 2 hours ago ago

      Love those robots! Unfortunately, we don't support the training and deployment side yet as we are focused only on data processing for now.

  • dostick 4 hours ago ago

    How robitics may be “scalable”?

    • pelagicAustral 4 hours ago ago

      Build a software implementation, lets call it The Matrix. Feed it to unknowing organic vessels, lets say Humans. Make it so they existence is a soothing mixture of comforting (fabricated) reality and inorganic desires. Extract power from these vessels. Make more robots. Profit.

    • kstonekuan 3 hours ago ago

      Our users process thousands of hours of data used in robotics model training, that's when they need scalable infrastructure to handle the workloads

  • hnvd8v0o2d 4 hours ago ago

    Filing this away