I found this to be a difficult read, and quite repetitive in sentence structure. (Ctrl+F says 25 instances of ":" on this page!)
It sounds like the product is intended to help you avoid performance-related regressions, and argues that the risk of performance regressions will increase with AI writing more code. That seems plausible, but it's unclear how or why this product is superior to existing performance testing as part of your CI/CD pipeline.
I found this to be a difficult read, and quite repetitive in sentence structure. (Ctrl+F says 25 instances of ":" on this page!)
It sounds like the product is intended to help you avoid performance-related regressions, and argues that the risk of performance regressions will increase with AI writing more code. That seems plausible, but it's unclear how or why this product is superior to existing performance testing as part of your CI/CD pipeline.
Those 25 instances of ":" are probably caused by author telling their LLM to replace em dash with colon.
The writing is hideous, I can see that being the case.
Claude slop.
[dead]