You don't "own" the hardware or the platform, you may create the code but you depend on the whims of others whether it is deployed and continues to work on such devices.
Best bet is to do mobile web development, most of the parts can be under your control and those that aren't (the phone) are beholding to web standards which can't change too radically.
I’d say the problem is that, at least in the US, the government was conceived as a democratic republic, but private enterprise wasn’t required to follow the same conceits, and so all our corporations behaved more like small dictatorships. Now that our corporations are megacorporations, and the government has lost the upper hand, the common people are at the mercy of these dictatorships. There’s no reason for Apple or Google to cede any control that they’ve already established, and we only see them grabbing more and more control as time goes by. Until the government regains the upper-hand, and begins to work again on behalf of actual people (with heartbeats), the firmware in our phones will continue to do the bidding of its true owner. Or if maybe, there’s a revolution or something. Maybe we could take public ownership of the phone lines and cell towers. Fat chance, huh?
You don't "own" the hardware or the platform, you may create the code but you depend on the whims of others whether it is deployed and continues to work on such devices.
Best bet is to do mobile web development, most of the parts can be under your control and those that aren't (the phone) are beholding to web standards which can't change too radically.
I’d say the problem is that, at least in the US, the government was conceived as a democratic republic, but private enterprise wasn’t required to follow the same conceits, and so all our corporations behaved more like small dictatorships. Now that our corporations are megacorporations, and the government has lost the upper hand, the common people are at the mercy of these dictatorships. There’s no reason for Apple or Google to cede any control that they’ve already established, and we only see them grabbing more and more control as time goes by. Until the government regains the upper-hand, and begins to work again on behalf of actual people (with heartbeats), the firmware in our phones will continue to do the bidding of its true owner. Or if maybe, there’s a revolution or something. Maybe we could take public ownership of the phone lines and cell towers. Fat chance, huh?
Which part of the mobile software infrastructure are you referring to?
Do you mean, for example, Jellyfin, which reaches out to my home server and is for my personal use? Because that works.
Or do you mean why don't we just write our own apps which talk to our own infrastructure?
Or do you mean that it's just hard to have your own/personal infrastructure? Or that most apps don't support your own infrastructure?
Or are you referring to the fact that the mobile platforms lock down things such as push notifications so that it absoultely must go through them?
Can you be a bit more specific?
This sounds like an interesting question, but really needs clarification on what you mean by “infrastructure.”
What are the economics of it for each stakeholder in the existing infrastructure?
How would changes to it comply with regulatory requirements?
Is it as reliable as the existing system?
Those answers are perhaps where the reasons lie.