35 comments

  • xnx 10 hours ago ago
  • jimnotgym 6 hours ago ago

    Did someone pay him for the rare meteorite? At least enough to fix the roof?

    Who should one contact if this happens?

    • ck2 28 minutes ago ago

      someone recently SOLD a t-rex skeleton for $50 MILLION (61% complete)

      so you should be able to sell meteorites that land on your property

      only thing you can't own/sell is NASA Moon Rocks

    • crooked-v 4 hours ago ago

      In the US, if a meteorite lands on your property, it's yours and you can sell or donate it as you please. This homeowner probably made a decent amount on the sale, especially with the emphasis on immediate preservation.

    • lagrange77 2 hours ago ago

      Everybody knows that. You contact NASA. Then a black helicopter will pick you up, bring you to an airbase and fly you straight to the white house, where you will be introduced to the actual truth, while a team of very excited scientists with biohazard suits praise and examine the artefact. If you're still sceptical, they will take you to a large hidden hangar in the middle of the desert and show you around.

      • spiderfarmer 2 hours ago ago

        Can’t take any US action movie seriously anymore. Not because of plotlines like this, but because they portray the team at the white house as somewhat capable.

        You have to suspend your disbelief harder at the 8 o’clock news nowadays.

        • lagrange77 an hour ago ago

          Watch Don't look up, if you haven't yet, it's brilliant.

          • spiderfarmer 41 minutes ago ago

            I did. It’s depressingly realistic.

    • Razengan 5 hours ago ago

      The Vogon hyperspace development council.

      • decimalenough 4 hours ago ago

        Now you just need to find their contact details. Beware the Leopard!

  • ButlerianJihad 11 hours ago ago

    The real jackpot here is how this large chunk happened to impact a home belonging to an astute and prepared individual:

      He then immediately preserved and documented the entire scene using disposable gloves and aluminum foil to place the meteorite fragments in glass jars.
    
    I can think of many diverse reactions to a meteor strike, but even NASA is singing the praises of this guy and his quick thinking.
    • lelanthran 4 hours ago ago

      > The real jackpot here is how this large chunk happened to impact a home belonging to an astute and prepared individual:

      Maybe chunks hit many people, but you only hear about the ones who are prepped and ready.

      • ozim an hour ago ago

        I see a parody of preppers in there.

        „Your bug out backpack is not enough, you need space bug out backpack”.

  • chrisjj 2 hours ago ago

    > Only one was recovered because it hit a house.

    You lost me there.

    Is recovery possible only if a house is hit??

    • alt219 2 hours ago ago

      From what I understand about this story, the homeowner had the presence of mind to immediately attempt to preserve the meteorite, which is what made subsequent analysis possible.

      Presumably other fragments landing outdoors with no one around taking similar steps to preserve them, even if they were to be recovered, would not be as valuable for study because of their exposure to the natural environment of Earth.

    • xingped 2 hours ago ago

      No? It's obvious the meaning is that most meteorites will never be found because they're tiny and no one witnesses where they land. If it hits a house you know where it landed.

  • accountrequired 2 hours ago ago

    its like we can explore the universe from our living room

    • amelius an hour ago ago

      It's like doorstep delivery, but faster and better.

  • fractallyte 9 hours ago ago

    "Our cameras in Northford, Connecticut, and Douglassville, Pennsylvania, as well as a doorbell camera in Wayne, New Jersey, captured the meteor, and from that we measured its trajectory... The path traced back to low in the asteroid belt."

    I don't doubt it, but that's an astounding trajectory estimation...

    • defrost 9 hours ago ago

      Desert Fireball Network, and less public precursor projects have been doing this for a while now:

      * https://dfn.gfo.rocks/

      * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert_Fireball_Network

      * https://pawsey.org.au/researchers/desert-fireball-network-te...

      • imoverclocked 8 hours ago ago

        From the wikipedia link:

        > The dark flight trajectory of a meteoroid is significantly affected by the atmospheric winds, especially by the jet stream. As a result, the meteorite fall position can be shifted by up to several kilometers compared to a scenario with no winds.

        That network is mostly interested in where it falls, not where it came from. A few degrees for finding an origin is a huge variation.

        • defrost 8 hours ago ago

          Planetary scientists are motivated to physically examine freshly fallen near pristine samples, yes. They are also keenly interested in origins, intra or extra solar system, relationships to known showers et al.

          The less public precursors were and still have an interest in both projected targets and sources.

    • anovikov 8 hours ago ago

      This is absolutely trivial as long as any fixed ground objects are visible in a camera and does not at all require some sub-pixel precision.

      • onion2k 6 hours ago ago

        It's trivial to draw a line between some fixed points and extrapolate back to an origin if there's no external forces acting on the asteroid. But there is - planetary gravity, the moon, potentially the sun heating one side of it, atmospheric wind, weather, etc make a big difference. That makes it harder.

        • anovikov 5 hours ago ago

          That's basics of meteor observation. As long as camera didn't move, you can plot the track against the stars and time is known. Then with two tracks from different locations, orbit is determined.

        • lazide 5 hours ago ago

          Also, a typical consumer camera is going to struggle (even with the best analysis!) to have visual accuracy within even a few degrees of true (due to everything from high compression ratios in post processing to shitty optical properties in the actual camera) and that makes a probability cone that is pretty large.

          Still better than nothing, though!

          • anovikov 3 hours ago ago

            building a WCS model (pixel XY <-> ray vectors) of a camera is a solved science. Of course you can never expect it to be rectangular.

  • ur-whale 2 hours ago ago

    > Researchers found preserved bits from near the surface of the original asteroid where it experienced concentrated salty fluids

    Are we sure the guy who picked it up didn't just wash it with some sort of detergent after it cooled off?

  • andrewstuart 10 hours ago ago

    Scene one of a Steven Spielberg movie.

  • pcrh 4 hours ago ago

    Browsing that site, The SETI Institute appears to have expanded beyond its original goal of finding extraterrestrial intelligence into astrobiology and more. Perhaps the first attempts at detecting alien radio signals hoped too much?

    I have little doubt that, given the infinite size of the universe, that extraterrestrial intelligence (of some sort) exists, the question is whether we will ever detect it... It perhaps even exists as close to us as Europa, should we attempt a landing there...

    • Enginerrrd an hour ago ago

      Detecting radio signals never made much sense to me.

      Even a few light years away, it’s almost infeasible to build a radio transmitter that could be detected above the noise floor. The amount of energy you’d need would be absurdly wasteful.

      • msdz a few seconds ago ago

        Wasteful by whose standards?

        If you’re an alien civilization with several dyson spheres, surely at some point you’d have sufficient energy/resources even for such a “hopeless” science-y project, right?

    • klez 2 hours ago ago

      No, ATTEMPT NO LANDING THERE!