6 comments

  • Leftium 3 hours ago ago

    Theo video based on data from Tencent's Autocodebench: https://youtu.be/iV1EcfZSdCM

    Conclusion: Elixir was the best (had the highest problem solve rate).

    Reasons (Theo's interpretation):

    - code collocation, where documentation is integrated directly within the source code

    - design philosophy of a language (readability, clear idioms, and strict expectation management)

    ---

    Sources from video:

    - https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/AutoCodeBenchmark/tree/ma...

    - https://martinalderson.com/posts/which-programming-languages...

    - https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jan/19/nanolang/#atom-everyth...

  • steveklabnik 4 hours ago ago

    The frontier moves quickly enough that empiric testing is often out of date by the time that it’s published.

    • mwigdahl 4 hours ago ago

      For sure! It's possible there are relatively invariant properties that make one language or another "better" for LLM coding in general though (even if that's just the self-fulfilling prophecy of size of the training corpus).

      • steveklabnik 4 hours ago ago

        I’m in agreement that I think that these exist, but I just haven’t seen anything that justifies this belief of mine yet. I have been looking, but it’s possible I just haven’t seen anything seen it.

        I’ve seen a lot of blog posts with fairly dubious claims here with relatively flimsy evidence. And I’ve seen a few papers trying to tackle the topic. But I think it’s a very open area of research currently.

  • markus_zhang 2 hours ago ago

    Which language is worst for AI? Just curious.

  • andsoitis 3 hours ago ago

    DSLs work especially well with LLMs. DSLs focus on a narrow set of concepts in a single domain.