10 comments

  • tmanchester a day ago ago

    Okay this is actually pretty cool. Gemma 4 is a nice little model and I've really enjoyed playing around with it. At 1800 tok/s turns are essentially instant, it's a bit of a trip

  • simianwords 16 hours ago ago

    I just tried it on their website and it is extremely fast. I wonder what is the value prop of this? Where would I want

    1. a smaller model

    2. also non local, hosted on cloud

    I can't think of any case.

    • johntash 12 hours ago ago

      OCR is a decent use-case for smaller models. I've had good experience using gemma for OCR'ing handwritten stuff that tesseract doesn't do so well on.

      But for 2, probably only useful if you have a huge batch workload you want to get done quicker and don't want the local hardware for it?

    • jamesponddotco 12 hours ago ago

      A voice assistant comes to mind. Ideally, it'd be local, but if you don't have the hardware you'll go with the cloud, in which case, the fastest, the better.

    • anthonypasq 16 hours ago ago

      speed is always better. if you have ever used a coding agent with 1000 tps going back to 50 seems like walking through sludge. for simple question i hate waiting 2 minutes for opus to loop 50 times just to read some files and answer a question.

      its not necessarily specifically labout gemma 4, but in a year or 2 when we have opus class models at 2000 tps imagine the productivity.

      • simianwords 15 hours ago ago

        Of course I think speed is preferable but I don’t see myself paying for a fast Gemma

        • anthonypasq 15 hours ago ago

          i mean, i can imagine a million different apps that use ai that want cheap multimodal capabilities with high latency.

    • simianwords 16 hours ago ago

      Answering myself: fancy autocomplete in my IDE?

      Text autocorrect on my phone? Like give it all the context about me and so on.

    • keynha 2 hours ago ago

      [dead]

  • Krishnaswaroop a day ago ago

    [flagged]