Not a kernel veteran, but I do send patches and reviews occasionally and as mentioned in the article, Sashiko is a big help. It can detect very obscure race conditions, stack leaks and other bugs that could cause a kernel panic. It's also really good at analyzing subsystem-specific nuances (in the IIO subsystem for example, it can get chip parameters from a datasheet and actually check whether the code reflects it correctly, e. g. with timing).
If you get reports on what looks like backdoor and do a gitblame, does the enail that returns get traced to other projects? Like is there a pattern detection to the authors that also allows for detection of current malicous contributors?
Not a kernel veteran, but I do send patches and reviews occasionally and as mentioned in the article, Sashiko is a big help. It can detect very obscure race conditions, stack leaks and other bugs that could cause a kernel panic. It's also really good at analyzing subsystem-specific nuances (in the IIO subsystem for example, it can get chip parameters from a datasheet and actually check whether the code reflects it correctly, e. g. with timing).
What percentage of those would be non-issues if the kernel used a different language?
If you get reports on what looks like backdoor and do a gitblame, does the enail that returns get traced to other projects? Like is there a pattern detection to the authors that also allows for detection of current malicous contributors?
URL changed but article from March OP;
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47547849
Needs a [26th March 2026] tag. That's, like, 3 months ago. Can anything in it still be relevant?
If it was a previous year one might expect (20xx). Anything posted in the same year does not typically have the date in the submission.
Not everyone is a AI-firehose-of-news enjoyer.
Sentiment was trending negative, HN needed some positive AI news, even if a bit old.