and NDAs should be limited to something like one year after your employment ends. no standalone "money for silence" contracts allowed of course. that would create a big incentive to keep your employees happy, avoid controversial projects like selling data to the military, publish or patent research instead of sitting on it and increase competition in all markets. could also help against sexual harassment.
Why event a year for a NDA? 1 month after leaving the company should be max. They are Meta, who cares what BS they are building to destroy peoples life's. There is no reason to keep these things secret. This is not MI6 or the CIA, its a massive corporation, they should not have any such rights.
I feel like buying the book just to stick it to Meta.
I did that. She’s a very good writer. While I haven’t finished it, I’ve enjoyed it so far.
Anti-disparagement employment agreements should be illegal, as they provide an almost entirely one-sided benefit.
> There is a binding interim arbitration
And forced-arbitration, which is also entirely one-sided.
and NDAs should be limited to something like one year after your employment ends. no standalone "money for silence" contracts allowed of course. that would create a big incentive to keep your employees happy, avoid controversial projects like selling data to the military, publish or patent research instead of sitting on it and increase competition in all markets. could also help against sexual harassment.
Why event a year for a NDA? 1 month after leaving the company should be max. They are Meta, who cares what BS they are building to destroy peoples life's. There is no reason to keep these things secret. This is not MI6 or the CIA, its a massive corporation, they should not have any such rights.
[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353965
And you're in some "HN bubble" if you resist Meta's new Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp subscriptions. Zuck needs more of your money.