12 comments

  • kaikai 5 hours ago ago

    I wonder if this is due to relative vigilance of men and women. This study observed that women tend to scan their environment much more than men: https://news.byu.edu/intellect/study-visually-captures-hard-...

    I’ve observed that animals are pretty good at reading body language and can tell when they’re actually being seen by, rather than just sharing space with, a human.

    • apothegm 3 hours ago ago

      Birds also tend to be reactive to forward facing pairs of eyes (because raptors, especially owls), so that would make sense.

      Beyond that, women are on average more likely to wear clothing or hair that flaps around. Or heels that make loud noises when they walk.

    • aaron695 5 hours ago ago

      [dead]

  • recursivecaveat 2 hours ago ago

    I wonder if spreading breadcrumbs is a more popular hobby among men than women?

  • AuthAuth an hour ago ago

    me to urban birds, me to

  • nephihaha 5 hours ago ago

    I'm wondering if there is some other variable in here. Is it clothing or hair length? Would men with long hair be more intimidating than women with short hair for example? How about certain types of clothing or footwear. Very odd.

    The seagulls near me can recognise school children. They know they are more likely to pick up dropped food.

    • Rury 4 hours ago ago

      They did control for obvious appearance differences (e.g. color & type of clothing, hair length) and morphology (e.g. height/body size), even people's approach. But not more subtle traits such as gait, waist-hip ratio, odor...

      One hypothesis suggested that in early history, women may have more commonly caught smaller prey (birds) than men did, and this fear could be evolutionarily ingrained.

    • cindyllm 5 hours ago ago

      [dead]

  • adampunk 4 hours ago ago

    It’s cats lol.

  • lobito25 6 hours ago ago

    They know...

    • postflopclarity 5 hours ago ago

      do they? if there's some insinuation here I'm not understanding it.