I'd say websearch and webfetch tools are very important but missing here. Great direction though, I also wonder about how much bloat could be eliminated...
Claw-code (reached 100k stars on github and I have made an article about them[0]) are currently re-writing claude-code in rust (they have already ported it to python)
How much of this was written using / by Claude? Not hating or snarking, BTW, just curious.
Why (especially if the answer above is 'yes' / 'most') do we collectively think Anthropic built such a heavy interface?
all of it, and I think the answer is 1. feature creep 2. a lot of nice-to-haves. the TUI alone is responsible for a lot of bloat
Even that TUI is written in React.
Claude code written for basic on your Apple II, because it'd be so retro.
I'd love to see it
I'd say websearch and webfetch tools are very important but missing here. Great direction though, I also wonder about how much bloat could be eliminated...
agree, I was more focused on bloat than pure utility
That sure is a lot of lines to avoid using getopts...
There seems to be only one possible option, --resume, and only one line is dedicated to handling it...
ok this is actually impressive, really. idk why no one commented yet
I am now waiting for, Claude Code rewritten in assembly project :)
(Maybe it can be a good project for anyone who works low-level)
we’re going to have a bunch of CC rewritten in <obscure language>
Waiting for Rust.
Claw-code (reached 100k stars on github and I have made an article about them[0]) are currently re-writing claude-code in rust (they have already ported it to python)
Its worth following: https://github.com/instructkr/claw-code
[0]: my article: https://smileplease.mataroa.blog/blog/claw-code-reaches-100k...