Despite my prior bias to agree with article, it includes this extraordinary line:
> So, for example, it recently turned out to be possible for eavesdroppers to decrypt messages without a key, simply by tampering with encrypted messages. Most technologists who work with PGP don’t understand it at a low enough level to see what’s wrong with it.
without citation. Such a writing choice makes me pause.
Despite my prior bias to agree with article, it includes this extraordinary line:
> So, for example, it recently turned out to be possible for eavesdroppers to decrypt messages without a key, simply by tampering with encrypted messages. Most technologists who work with PGP don’t understand it at a low enough level to see what’s wrong with it.
without citation. Such a writing choice makes me pause.