Besides the potential issues with sending user requests to this site, it's only a single URL and could be easily ignored. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something. Wouldn't proxying and caching requests on behalf of your users make more sense?
I believe their site is encouraging users to replicate data from their site on other pages, the data being sourced from multiple locations is intended to be the attack.
Besides the potential issues with sending user requests to this site, it's only a single URL and could be easily ignored. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something. Wouldn't proxying and caching requests on behalf of your users make more sense?
I believe their site is encouraging users to replicate data from their site on other pages, the data being sourced from multiple locations is intended to be the attack.
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46577464