34 comments

  • pavel_lishin 17 hours ago ago

    Is "Full Self-Driving" still the term they use to describe a mode that does not actually fully self-drive the car?

    • JumpCrisscross 16 hours ago ago

      > Is "Full Self-Driving" still the term they use to describe a mode that does not actually fully self-drive the car?

      To be fair it's appended with "(Supervised)".

      • IvyMike 16 hours ago ago

        This is very forthright (misleading)

      • cornonthecobra 40 minutes ago ago

        "Full" "Self"-"Driving" ("Supervised")

      • UltraSane 13 hours ago ago

        That is extremely (dis)honest

      • adammarples 11 hours ago ago

        Fully Edible Cakes (Poisonous)

      • FireBeyond 16 hours ago ago

        Yes, after being battered by everyone from NHTSA to the FTC to threats from class action lawyers, that was added, several years later. To be fair.

        • JumpCrisscross 15 hours ago ago

          Sure. Was just responding to OP's "still."

    • CursedSilicon 17 hours ago ago

      Hey! I'll have you know that trillionaire-because-he-absolutely-deserved-it Elon of Musky promised Full Self Driving in 2017. That's next year! /s

      • gdulli 16 hours ago ago

        Sounds like you're using an LLM as your calendar.

        • CursedSilicon 16 hours ago ago

          The joke was meant to be that next year is actually 2027. Which means Elmo's promised FSD is almost a decade late

          • gdulli 15 hours ago ago

            I know, I was adding on the joke that LLMs can't get the year right.

  • darkteflon 16 hours ago ago

    What happens to people who paid for it as part of the sticker price? Are they grandfathered permanently?

    • olyjohn 10 hours ago ago

      Doesn't matter, they'll be buying new cars before they get full self driving.

      • spwa4 4 hours ago ago

        Buying consists of paying and receiving a good or service.

        Clearly they'll be doing half of buying, and not the other half.

    • graemep 16 hours ago ago

      It sounds as though they are from the wording, but who knows what a future update may bring?

      • amlib 9 hours ago ago

        Ad supported self-driving mode for the grandfathered in customers, of course.

  • jmpman 13 hours ago ago

    I paid for FSD the first month it was offered monthly. Was so bad I wanted my money back but couldn’t figure out how to get Tesla to refund. Feel worse for those who paid the full $8k

    • jerlam 11 hours ago ago

      It was $15k at the peak of Tesla hype. That's the cost of subscribing for 12.5 years.

  • m463 12 hours ago ago

    Their cars become less and less attractive.

    No dashboard, later no turn signals, no drive stalk, defrost on touchscreen, now car is becoming subscription-based...

  • JumpCrisscross 18 hours ago ago

    Make hay while the sun shines. BYD will force self driving to table stakes in a few years.

    • blackoil 17 hours ago ago

      Not just BYD, huawei solution is almost at par with Tesla. German, Korean, Chinese all will be there in few years.

    • graemep 16 hours ago ago

      Once they are established they will require a subscription, or they will stop support after a few years so you have to buy a new car or pay more to get extended support.

      Whatever it takes to extract more money from you.

      • JumpCrisscross 15 hours ago ago

        > Once they are established they will require a subscription, or they will stop support after a few years so you have to buy a new car or pay more to get extended support

        Not how competition and commoditisation works.

        • graemep 14 hours ago ago

          No, its how vendor lock in and deceptive pricing work.

          • JumpCrisscross 10 hours ago ago

            > its how vendor lock in and deceptive pricing work

            Which doesn’t work for a commodity. If self-driving fails to commoditise, you’re right. It currently looks like it’s going to be commoditises, with every car-industrial cluster having a couple options for manufacturers.

  • hnspirit95 14 hours ago ago

    I can't help but think of an absurd situation where your subscription ends mid use and results in a crash. Like I'm sure the engineers have thought of this but the image of someone cruising down the road and getting a popup to enter their payment info before careening off a cliff is just so humorous... until the horrifying possibility that it could be reality sinks in.

  • toomuchtodo 18 hours ago ago

    Ran out of suckers to pay the lump sum.

  • KellyCriterion 15 hours ago ago

    doumented here:

    https://elontime.io/

  • 15 hours ago ago
    [deleted]
  • calmbonsai 13 hours ago ago

    I mean, at least in the U.S., an "FSD System" can't (yet) be held fully liable and there's not enough legal precedent for it (atm) even if it could.

    Thus, if you drive in the U.S., you're both stupid and irresponsible if you utilize any "FSD" system while you're behind the wheel. Note that this legally distinct from "autonomous self-driving" like Waymo.

    I have zero doubt we'll eventually get there, but it's going to be quite some time (over a decade?) for real FSD to be ubiquitous enough for the requisite traffic law changes and for this stuff to have gone through enough legal challenges in the various state courts.

    • qwerpy 13 hours ago ago

      Stupid and irresponsible driver here. It drives quite well and saves me considerable mental energy on every drive I make now. If it gets into a wreck I know I’m liable, but in years of using it, that hasn’t happened. So why not enjoy the more relaxing drives now?

      • everfrustrated 10 hours ago ago

        All rental cars should have FSD. I would argue FSD drives considerably better than the average tourist. Wins for everyone.

  • andrewmcwatters 18 hours ago ago

    [dead]