33 comments

  • GrinningFool a day ago ago

    The animations don't seem to be retained across nodes, which seems to make the animations pretty noise more than a means to convey useful information.

    For example in this simplified chart:

        flowchart LR
            subgraph Inputs
                A
                B
            end
    
            subgraph Middleware
                M 
            end
    
            subgraph Outputs
                X
                Y
            end
    
            A --> M
            B --> M
            M --> X
            M --> Y
            G --> L
        end
    ```

    The input animation colors are pink and green, but the next step (M->output) is blue and orange.

    I'd expect to see actual flow of usage/data (and if it included diagram syntax to specify message rates, etc that would be even better). So if there's a blue dot on the input side, I should be able to track that on the output side to its final destination.

  • n0um3n4 2 days ago ago

    Huh... I'm not being to login with github :/ it says 404:

    https://github.com/login/oauth/authorize?access_type=offline...

  • me_bx 3 days ago ago

    Congrats on launching.

    It might be worth considering a feature to time/schedule each flow's animation, rather than having them run in an infinite loop, all at the same time.

    UX feedback:

    * The animation and the whole interface are sluggish on firefox/linux. There's about 1 sec delay after each action (like clicking on an option). * The site's CSS does not load on an old version of Chrome - v90 - (and the chart and animation don't either).

  • frankhsu 3 days ago ago

    I love it. I saw a comment in this thread saying that adding animation to a chart is pointless.

    However in some public speeches, I've always wanted to add some cool charts to attract attention. Especially at large events, a slightly different presentation can make my stuff stand out and gain more attention.

    Your work has a nice launch here in HackerNews but no upvotes on ProductHunt, so I just voted there to support you

    • tillcarlos 3 days ago ago

      Yeah, 100%. Just having something to move around catches the eye. Cheap trick but works - that's why most short videos have subtitles.

      I love this idea. Problem is: it competes with "Hey Claude, take this diagram and animate it". The results are different (worse / better in different regards), but you can modify it more to your liking.

      Maybe I'm not seeing the exact use case. I was very close to buying the plan (3 usd / m is a steal), but with Claude I can be more specific what I want.

      • scoot 3 days ago ago

        Short videos have subtitles for engagement with those watching without sound (a significant proportion)

      • max002 2 days ago ago

        it depends, if I want to create and edit graph fast, make sure style is consistent etc. then this suits my needs better.

    • bairess 3 days ago ago

      Yes. I could just render the .mmd plain as vanilla and will works just fine for devs but It may not get the attention of non technical folks

    • j45 3 days ago ago

      Motion definitely can help charts work better. Especially when the charts get really complex or detailed.

  • marapuru 3 days ago ago

    It looks nice at first sight, but which data moves to which point exactly? Every element has blobs with all colours of the rainbow just moving across a line.

    Wouldn't it be better if a Red square emits a Red ball that moves to some place? Or at least highlight 'paths' to show how stuff actually moves around?

  • tillcarlos 3 days ago ago

    Awesome idea! I'm trying to use it for a YouTube video.

    This graph here has display issues. And the CPU is used waay too much on firefox

    ``` flowchart TD Step1["*Step 1: POC* (4 weeks)<br/>Vibe code for ONE tenant"]

        Step1 --> Validate & Hire
    
        Validate["Validation (4 weeks)"]
        Hire["Hire developer (4 weeks)"]
    
        Validate & Hire --> Spec
    
        subgraph Spec["**Step 3: Specification** (with dev)"]
            SpecStart["Parallel"] --> UI["UI prototype"]
            SpecStart --> POC["POCs of all parts"]
            SpecStart --> Arch["Architecture + stack"]
            SpecStart --> Infra["Infrastructure"]
            SpecStart --> FullSpec["Full MVP spec"]
            UI & POC & Arch & Infra & FullSpec --> SpecEnd["Done"]
        end
    ```
    • bairess 3 days ago ago

      Feel you, Im running FF/macos as well and svg aniamtions over CPU/GPU could be a problem. Im planning to address this issue soon

  • victor_y 3 days ago ago

    Looking quite promising! I would love to use this as a code friendly animated diagraming tool. Some feature requests that would make it stand out for me:

    1. Have you thought about creating some react components that would render these? You could then embed them in webpages and docs using something like https://fumadocs.dev/

    2. For the animations themselves, you could have more customization options. For instance, adding the support for text cards or different shapes. I think having the option to add text in the moving parts would be really helpful for this kind of use case.

  • Oras 3 days ago ago

    Nice! I always looked for a solution to animate diagrams as it would help a lot in visualising the workflow.

    Feedback:

    1. I tried different mermaid diagrams from https://mermaid.live/, and your animation is only working with classes and flowcharts. It didn't work with the sequence diagram (which is the most interesting to me).

    2. It would be great to control the animation to be a sequence instead of one animation for all arrows at once. What I would like to do is show fellow devs the workflow from start to finish, according to the spec.

    I appreciate that this is just a start, but it looks promising and has great potential. Good luck!

    • bairess 3 days ago ago

      Thanks for the valuable feedback. I already cover most of the issues that you described. Should be good to go in the next release

  • euroderf a day ago ago

    Go has a package to parse its own source. Use it to map a Go executable to Fanfa and then take a front row seat to watch your code execute.

  • mal10c 3 days ago ago

    I don't understand how to use this, but it does touch on an interesting topic. I want to create interactive and animated diagrams. I normally use either Draw.io or plantuml. My goal is to better teach folks about the systems I'm building, through better visualizations. Something like IcePanel (which is way too expensive) sort of shows flows, but I'd like to have full control. Does this tool claim to support something like that? If not, are there options out there that I don't know about?

  • j45 3 days ago ago

    This looks great.

    For the demo on the screen, it would be great to reveal each subgraph as a step before it all flows together.

    Is there any thought / plan / feasibility for adding a "reveal" type verb that could be placed between each subgraph to wait for a keypress to reveal the next subgraph? In the meantime, one could create 3 diagrams I guess of with one more subgraph added.

  • fwip 3 days ago ago

    Is there a way to control the mechanics of the animation? I poked around a bit and didn't see a way to configure what was sent down the arrows or how often - just some theming options.

    For example, if you're visualizing a user flow, you might want rules about when new "objects" are sent down the pipe (example node rule: wait until received one item from each input), or how fast they travel, etc.

    • bairess 3 days ago ago

      There will more a powerful controls for each node soon. For now there is a "Director mode" to control speed and traffic.

  • jankovicsandras 3 days ago ago

    Looks cool!

    Here's some feedback:

    - the diagram is not centered and zoomed by default, this is easy to fix

    - it would be great to have better animation controls, like progressbar, play half speed, etc.

    - it would be great to be able to export animation to video, animgif, etc. e. g. with ffmpeg.js

  • knuit 3 days ago ago

    I would love an option to export as a gif that loops perfectly.

  • jadbox 2 days ago ago

    - how much is Pro and what does it do?

    - can I download as animated gif or mpeg4 to embed into slides?

  • difosfor 3 days ago ago

    I don't see anything animated except a bit on load? I don't get it. This is on iOS Safari.

    • bairess 3 days ago ago

      Will take a look let me know the details please

  • emmavis 2 days ago ago

    Looks good, can i animate just connection to clicked node?

  • 2muchcoffeeman 3 days ago ago

    Can’t tell from that link. Is there a better layout engine?

  • larodi 3 days ago ago

    I don't understand who in the world needs animated something on his diagrams.

    • nantangitan 3 days ago ago

      There's been times in the past when I've had nontechnical stakeholders present for otherwise technical meetings. A little bit of colour and a little bit of animation can go a long way to helping people who may be less familiar with this type of diagram to understand it better.

      All the better if I can take an existing diagram and just spruce it up slightly for presentation.

      • larodi 14 hours ago ago

        I’ve done my fair share of diagramming and one thing I know for sure is markup (In he visual one) needs to be as clear as possible.

        As someone who started with demo scene and all I can understand the drive to have moving parts and all the gay stuff, but many people get easily confused by colours and animation.

  • max002 3 days ago ago

    wow, this is cool, to be frank im working on something similar so we might end up being competition xD but i dont want to hijack thread, nice work and congrats on release, upvoted you on producthunt!

  • yakbarber 3 days ago ago

    love it!