My immediate thought is the "belief silos" from Neal Stephenson's Fall. I don't think letting people pick and choose different versions of the same article according to how it aligns with their world views is going to be great for Wikipedia's credibility in the long term.
All of the short summaries of the theses sounded reasonable when I read them. Then when I looked at their expanded descriptions it became clear that this is just more whinging from the right that their viewpoints are not adequately represented.
As always, you have a right to free speech. There's no right that we have to listen to your nonsense.
> Thesis: Enable competing articles.
My immediate thought is the "belief silos" from Neal Stephenson's Fall. I don't think letting people pick and choose different versions of the same article according to how it aligns with their world views is going to be great for Wikipedia's credibility in the long term.
All of the short summaries of the theses sounded reasonable when I read them. Then when I looked at their expanded descriptions it became clear that this is just more whinging from the right that their viewpoints are not adequately represented.
As always, you have a right to free speech. There's no right that we have to listen to your nonsense.