My ISP in a small rural town supported IPv6. I have a few personal projects that only have a public v6 address because I don't want to pay AWS for an v4 address.
It worked fine for a year and a half after I moved in, then they did some work and suddenly no IPv6. At least I could enable 6to4 on my router, but that has intermittent issues.
As someone who wishes IPv4 would just die, I wish I had options to push back on such nuisances.
Reports say IPv6 is gaining market share. But most ISPs are delegating /64 prefix. This is as useless as carrier grade NAT. Atleast with IPv4, I can create NATed subnets for guests, IoT devices etc. That's not possible with IPv6.
Overall it's a negative progress. Worse than IPv4+NAT.
My ISP in a small rural town supported IPv6. I have a few personal projects that only have a public v6 address because I don't want to pay AWS for an v4 address.
It worked fine for a year and a half after I moved in, then they did some work and suddenly no IPv6. At least I could enable 6to4 on my router, but that has intermittent issues.
As someone who wishes IPv4 would just die, I wish I had options to push back on such nuisances.
IPv6 adoption visualizations from others:
- Meta: https://www.facebook.com/ipv6/
- Akamai: https://www.akamai.com/security-research/ipv6-adoption-visua...
- Cloudflare: https://radar.cloudflare.com/adoption-and-usage
Reports say IPv6 is gaining market share. But most ISPs are delegating /64 prefix. This is as useless as carrier grade NAT. Atleast with IPv4, I can create NATed subnets for guests, IoT devices etc. That's not possible with IPv6.
Overall it's a negative progress. Worse than IPv4+NAT.
What happens first?
GTA 6 or GitHub IPv6
Half Life 3