"Two reviewers independently selected studies with high-concentration THC defined as greater than 5 mg or greater than 10% THC per serving or labeled as “high-potency concentrate,” “shatter,” or “dab.”"
Two reviewers who apparently knew very little about THC dosages.
"Ninety-nine studies (221 097 participants) were included...; more than 95% had moderate or high risk of bias."
Or cared about evidence quality.
Who funded this?
"Primary Funding Source: Colorado General Assembly, House Bill 21-1317."
Ah. The People of Colorado. I wonder if they know?
from the article -
"Two reviewers independently selected studies with high-concentration THC defined as greater than 5 mg or greater than 10% THC per serving or labeled as “high-potency concentrate,” “shatter,” or “dab.”"
Two reviewers who apparently knew very little about THC dosages.
"Ninety-nine studies (221 097 participants) were included...; more than 95% had moderate or high risk of bias."
Or cared about evidence quality.
Who funded this?
"Primary Funding Source: Colorado General Assembly, House Bill 21-1317."
Ah. The People of Colorado. I wonder if they know?
It's Reefer Madness!