If the internet, and thus, the "addiction" that is claimed by other people to be oppressing the masses is simply labeled a "narcotic" type influence upon a person's wellbeing then, they would then consider it for such offensive action?
> “It’s insanely broad,” Professor Goldsmith said. “This is an open-ended war authorization against an untold number of countries, organizations and persons that the president could deem within its scope.”
> The draft appears to be modeled on the broad authorization that Congress granted President George W. Bush after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Like that one, it does not name a specific enemy — empowering the president to decide whom to target — and is not confined to geographical limits.
If the internet, and thus, the "addiction" that is claimed by other people to be oppressing the masses is simply labeled a "narcotic" type influence upon a person's wellbeing then, they would then consider it for such offensive action?
So the Sackler family, right?
Right?
> “It’s insanely broad,” Professor Goldsmith said. “This is an open-ended war authorization against an untold number of countries, organizations and persons that the president could deem within its scope.”
> The draft appears to be modeled on the broad authorization that Congress granted President George W. Bush after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Like that one, it does not name a specific enemy — empowering the president to decide whom to target — and is not confined to geographical limits.
The USA is turning into a rogue state.
https://archive.is/TtiWh