Tom Wessels has a great chapter in Part 1 of his "Reading the Forested Landscape" video series about New England stonewalls. [0] A common myth is the walls were built over time due to the rocks being pushed up by the frost but that's not true!
The over 125k miles of stonewalls were built in just thirty years because of sheep.
Stone walls were built because of deforestation caused by clearcutting land to make sheep pastures, made wood for fences unavailable.
Hmm I had always thought that the deforestation was caused by demand for wood for heating and cooking.
Something about this sounds incomplete. A farmer isn't going to waste his time making a wall, especially the dodgy disorganized walls that are common in the region. A farmer doesn't need a shallow wall, stone or wood. The walls you come across in new england in the forest look exactly like people expect, a place on the edge of your farm to dump rocks. Now, maybe not frost grown, but New England has lots of rocks everywhere.
For folks not from New England: it's very normal to walk through inhabited the woods in New England and come upon a seemingly totally random stone wall in the middle of nowhere.
Much of New England is 2nd(?) growth forest -- the original forests were chopped down to make space for farmland. The soil is incredibly rocky, and so farmers would go through there fields and chuck the rocks to the side, making the walls. Eventually people realized that New England's rocky soil was not very good for farming/local farming became less important as food was able to be transported longer distances, and much of the farm land was abandoned and eventually reforested -- with the only the rock walls remaining (or at least that's what I was taught growing up there).
I can see portions of a few walls that are out in spots that used to have a road over 100 years ago but now are reclaimed by the forest. Some of areas are densely overgrown now. Nice work.
I used to work for a company that did GIS mapping of guard rails, lines, and road signs. Part of what we always ended up doing was massaging the data we received from the Lidar mapping to line things up to exact locations for clients. If this map is accurate, I salute whoever spent the time fixing the details.
I don't have much experience with lidar, but I do with machine learning based approaches with photographic data. There has been a massive explosion in the last 5-10 years in filtering and processing algorithm advances that can more readily clean up false positives and insignificant noise. I would assume the barriers to high quality data are quite a bit lower now.
My first thought is for historical research. It would be quite a bit of help if you have some old town or settlement map that you can compare to/overlay with a LiDAR stone wall map.
I am not sure, but it may also serve historical preservation purposes if that is an issue, e.g., if administrators are deciding on land partitioning and/or development plans.
I'm across the river from you, and my understanding is that a lot of the incorrect street names on online maps come from data sources with older names. E911 apparently caused a certain amount of upheaval with road names.
Some of the online mapping services seem to have compromised by just listing all possible names for a road, whereas OnX seems to be working off of a different (older?) data set than nearly everyone.
Tom Wessels has a great chapter in Part 1 of his "Reading the Forested Landscape" video series about New England stonewalls. [0] A common myth is the walls were built over time due to the rocks being pushed up by the frost but that's not true!
The over 125k miles of stonewalls were built in just thirty years because of sheep.
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcLQz-oR6sw&t=129s
Stone walls were built because of deforestation caused by clearcutting land to make sheep pastures, made wood for fences unavailable.
Hmm I had always thought that the deforestation was caused by demand for wood for heating and cooking.
Something about this sounds incomplete. A farmer isn't going to waste his time making a wall, especially the dodgy disorganized walls that are common in the region. A farmer doesn't need a shallow wall, stone or wood. The walls you come across in new england in the forest look exactly like people expect, a place on the edge of your farm to dump rocks. Now, maybe not frost grown, but New England has lots of rocks everywhere.
For folks not from New England: it's very normal to walk through inhabited the woods in New England and come upon a seemingly totally random stone wall in the middle of nowhere.
Much of New England is 2nd(?) growth forest -- the original forests were chopped down to make space for farmland. The soil is incredibly rocky, and so farmers would go through there fields and chuck the rocks to the side, making the walls. Eventually people realized that New England's rocky soil was not very good for farming/local farming became less important as food was able to be transported longer distances, and much of the farm land was abandoned and eventually reforested -- with the only the rock walls remaining (or at least that's what I was taught growing up there).
I can see portions of a few walls that are out in spots that used to have a road over 100 years ago but now are reclaimed by the forest. Some of areas are densely overgrown now. Nice work.
I have deep knowledge of only a tiny few square miles of sparsely-populated mostly-forest in New Hampshire.
I see both surprsing accuracy, and the occasional baffling "I wonder what looked dense there??" errors.
So as usual, LIDAR returns non-intuitive results sometimes, and is ideally refined by ground research, when the budget allows.
But I'll definitely check out the apparent errors in more detail next time I'm there. :)
I used to work for a company that did GIS mapping of guard rails, lines, and road signs. Part of what we always ended up doing was massaging the data we received from the Lidar mapping to line things up to exact locations for clients. If this map is accurate, I salute whoever spent the time fixing the details.
I don't have much experience with lidar, but I do with machine learning based approaches with photographic data. There has been a massive explosion in the last 5-10 years in filtering and processing algorithm advances that can more readily clean up false positives and insignificant noise. I would assume the barriers to high quality data are quite a bit lower now.
This is neat. I'm curious to know what the practical uses of this information are? Anyone know?
My first thought is for historical research. It would be quite a bit of help if you have some old town or settlement map that you can compare to/overlay with a LiDAR stone wall map.
I am not sure, but it may also serve historical preservation purposes if that is an issue, e.g., if administrators are deciding on land partitioning and/or development plans.
very cool project and map. I've recently picked up stone masonry so this is super great to view
This is neat. I see a few incorrect street names where I live, but also some old stone walls near where I frequently walk.
I'm across the river from you, and my understanding is that a lot of the incorrect street names on online maps come from data sources with older names. E911 apparently caused a certain amount of upheaval with road names.
Some of the online mapping services seem to have compromised by just listing all possible names for a road, whereas OnX seems to be working off of a different (older?) data set than nearly everyone.