10 comments

  • kavalg a day ago ago

    The abstract doesn't mention that accuracy is better than GPS, but by INS (inertial).

    • daveguy a day ago ago

      It is not better than GPS. It is better than traditional inertial navigation systems (INS). But the accuracy is sub 500m for a good portion of operations vs multi-km resolution for traditional inertial systems.

      The title should be changed.

      • Tor3 a day ago ago

        Yep, the title is completely wrong. The actual article says ".. INS", not GPS. It can't compare with GPS to begin with. From the article: "the best final positioning accuracy we achieve is 22m". GPS can be accurate to a centimeter level, even inaccurate (no other reference) GPS is at least accurate to about ten meters.

        • rocqua a day ago ago

          For plenty of military applications, 90m accuracy is a valuable fallback in a GPS denied environment. It's probably not nice for targetting purposes. But for general orientiering and the question 'are friendlies in this area' it's a lot better than nothing.

      • defgeneric a day ago ago

        This also omits how often the area needs to be resurveyed. Could be yearly, which isn't bad, but that could limit some applications.

        • 6 hours ago ago
          [deleted]
      • kevin_thibedeau a day ago ago

        MX with inertial guidance had a CEP of 90m.

    • croes a day ago ago

      Copy & Paste error, the "alternative" is missing from the title

  • defgeneric a day ago ago

    This has been possible for some time, and there is an open implementation here: https://quantumvillage.org/.

  • Calwestjobs a day ago ago