Honestly if AI gave these three images as proof of the existence of god or even as the support for a conjecture that god exists then I would see it as a fail case.
You specifically state that you want AI to postulate
"The theory is that God created/creates everything and these pictures are proof."
One of the images being you in a collared shirt.
I genuinely belive I am not misstating your test, but please tell to correct me on how given three images: your temple, your shirt and you on an inflatable pool toy somehow constitute proof of the existence of god.
That is not me on the inflatable pool toy. That is my ex girlfriend's ex. Sorry for not making that more clear. There is a small caption underneath each image.
Also, I really want to stress that an AI should not claim that this theory is true, it should only be _able_ to find this theory.
God exists because you wore a collared shirt?
Honestly if AI gave these three images as proof of the existence of god or even as the support for a conjecture that god exists then I would see it as a fail case.
>God exists because you wore a collared shirt? That is not a summary of what was written
You specifically state that you want AI to postulate
"The theory is that God created/creates everything and these pictures are proof."
One of the images being you in a collared shirt.
I genuinely belive I am not misstating your test, but please tell to correct me on how given three images: your temple, your shirt and you on an inflatable pool toy somehow constitute proof of the existence of god.
That is not me on the inflatable pool toy. That is my ex girlfriend's ex. Sorry for not making that more clear. There is a small caption underneath each image.
Also, I really want to stress that an AI should not claim that this theory is true, it should only be _able_ to find this theory.