All valid points. All points brought up the last time each pre-AI advancement came up. Before, it was "AI will take all our jobs", it was "Automation will take all our jobs". Nonetheless, important questions, but I think we need to refrain from "the sky is falling" mentality and stay focused on positive solutions.
> AI is a powerful tool, but its impact depends on how it is developed and deployed. The challenge lies in ensuring it solves more problems than it creates, while addressing ethical concerns and potential unintended consequences.
I think this premise is flawed. Ethics vary between groups of people. Those in power, in business, and regular people have different, often adverserial, interests.
I.e. mass surveillance is a problem for regular people, but a problem solved for those in power or business.
The key is to demand an acceptable compromise between what are effectively opposing interests.
All valid points. All points brought up the last time each pre-AI advancement came up. Before, it was "AI will take all our jobs", it was "Automation will take all our jobs". Nonetheless, important questions, but I think we need to refrain from "the sky is falling" mentality and stay focused on positive solutions.
> AI is a powerful tool, but its impact depends on how it is developed and deployed. The challenge lies in ensuring it solves more problems than it creates, while addressing ethical concerns and potential unintended consequences.
I think this premise is flawed. Ethics vary between groups of people. Those in power, in business, and regular people have different, often adverserial, interests.
I.e. mass surveillance is a problem for regular people, but a problem solved for those in power or business.
The key is to demand an acceptable compromise between what are effectively opposing interests.