> One with tools more powerful, elegant, and accessible: Linux.
This didn't seem to fit with the rest of the article up to this point. It was all about doing your own thing and what works best for you. Linux being the most powerful, elegant, and accessible is _highly_ dependent on the user and what they are actually trying to do on their computer.
There was also a warning to Arch users not to spend too much time customizing, because it's all about productivity, but ends on recommending the user spend time distro hopping before picking something... right after saying the distro didn't matter that much.
I was very much on board until it took this left turn at the end.
> One with tools more powerful, elegant, and accessible: Linux.
This didn't seem to fit with the rest of the article up to this point. It was all about doing your own thing and what works best for you. Linux being the most powerful, elegant, and accessible is _highly_ dependent on the user and what they are actually trying to do on their computer.
There was also a warning to Arch users not to spend too much time customizing, because it's all about productivity, but ends on recommending the user spend time distro hopping before picking something... right after saying the distro didn't matter that much.
I was very much on board until it took this left turn at the end.
Daily driving and distro hopping, kind of like the dilemma of monogamy and polygamy :)